Explaining non-conforming valuesλ︎
clojure.spec.alpha/explain
describes why a value does not satisfy a specification.
clojure.spec.alpha/explain
takes two arguments
- a specification
- a value to test against the specification
Success
string is sent to standard out if the value meets the specification
A string explaining where the value deviates from the specification is sent to standard out if the value does not meet the specification.
There are several variations on the explain function for different situations
explain
- sends the return value to the standard out / REPLexplain-str
- returns a human readable result.explain-data
- returns a data structure of the error to be processed by other code
Example of a failing valueλ︎
First define a namespace and require the Clojure Spec namespace
(ns practicalli.clojure.specifications
(:require [clojure.spec.alpha :as spec]))
(spec/def ::meaning-of-life #(= 42 %))
Given the following specification
Using the value 24
with that specification will fail. Using explain we can see why
In this case explain returned the
- value being checked against the spec
- result of that check (failed)
- predicate used to check the value
- spec name used to check the value
Notice that the value failed on the first condition, :integer
, then stopped without checking the second, :string
. The spec/and
macro works the same as clojure.core/and
in that is stops as soon as something fails.
In this case we still have the value checked, the result and the predicate
More information is provided as to where in the spec the value failed
:at
shows the path in the spec where the failure occurred, very useful for nested structures
This shows the value of naming your specs descriptively
Explain with a stringλ︎
rather than send information to the system out